Claim of Shia about Ali

بسم الله الرحمن الرحيم       


In the Name of Allah The most Gracious The Most Merciful


The Shia’s claim Ali was supposed to be Khalifa after the Prophet sallallahu alaihi wasallam

What is the ruling on people who claim that the Messenger (صلى الله عليه وسلم) appointed ‘Ali (رضي الله عنه) as khaleefah, and say that the Sahaabah (رضوان الله عليهم) conspired against him?

On the contrary, a great deal of evidence shows that the khaleefah after the Prophet (صلى الله عليه وسلم) was Abu Bakr al-Siddeeq (رضي الله عنه). But the Prophet (صلى الله عليه وسلم) did not state that clearly and he did not appoint him in any definitive sense; rather he gave commands which indicated that, when he told him to lead the people in prayer when he (the Prophet صلى الله عليه وسلم) was sick, and when he told him about the leadership of the Muslim community after his death, saying, “Allaah and the believers will only accept Abu Bakr.” Hence the Sahaabah (رضوان الله عليهم) gave their allegiance (bay’ah) to Abu Bakr and they were unanimously agreed that Abu Bakr was the best among them. It was reported in the hadeeth of Ibn ‘Umar (رضي الله عنه) that the Sahaabah (رضوان الله عليهم) used to say during the Prophet’s life: “The best of this ummah after its Prophet is Abu Bakr, then ‘Umar, then ‘Uthmaan,” and the Prophet (صلى الله عليه وسلم) approved of their saying that. Mutawaatir reports from ‘Ali (رضي الله عنه) show that he used to say, “The best of this ummah after its Prophet is Abu Bakr then ‘Umar.” And he (رضي الله عنه) used to say, “No one is brought to me who prefers me over them, but I will whip him with the hadd punishment for telling lies.” He never claimed that he was the best of this ummah, or that the Messenger of Allaah (صلى الله عليه وسلم) had appointed him as khaleefah. He never said that the Sahaabah (رضوان الله عليهم) had wronged him and taken away his rights. When Faatimah (رضي الله عنها) died he gave a second pledge of allegiance (bay’ah) to Abu Bakr, as confirmation of his first pledge and to demonstrate to the people that he was with the jamaa’ah (the main group of Muslims) and that he had no reservations in his heart against giving his allegiance to Abu Bakr (رضي الله عنه). When ‘Umar was stabbed, he appointed six of those whom the Prophet (صلى الله عليه وسلم) had testified were guaranteed Paradise, for them to appoint one of their number as ‘Umar’s successor; among these six was ‘Ali, who never denounced ‘Umar, either whilst he was still alive or after his death. ‘Ali did not say that he was more entitled than any of them to be khaleefah, so how can anyone have the right to tell lies about the Messenger of Allaah (صلى الله عليه وسلم) and say that he appointed ‘Ali as khaleefah? ‘Ali himself never made any such claim, and none of the Sahaabah claimed that for him. Rather they were unanimously agreed that the caliphate of Abu Bakr, ‘Umar and ‘Uthmaan was valid; ‘Ali acknowledged that and he cooperated with all of them in jihad, shoora (consultation), etc. Moreover, the Muslims after the Sahaabah were agreed upon that which the Sahaabah had been agreed on. After all this, it is not permissible for anyone or for any group, Shi’ah or others, to claim that ‘Ali was the appointed successor, or that the caliphate before him was false. Similarly, no one has the right to say that the Sahaabah wronged ‘Ali and took away his rights. Rather this is the falsest of falsehoods, and it is thinking badly of the Companions of the Messenger of Allaah (صلى الله عليه وسلم), including ‘Ali (رضي الله عنه). Allaah has protected the ummah of Muhammad (صلى الله عليه وسلم) and kept it from agreeing on misguidance. It was narrated in a saheeh report in many ahaadeeth that the Prophet (صلى الله عليه وسلم) said: “A group of my ummah will continue to adhere to the truth and to prevail.” It is impossible that the noblest generation of this ummah could agree on falsehood, supposedly the caliphate of Abu Bakr, ‘Umar and ‘Uthmaan. No one says this who believes in Allaah and the Last Day, and no one says this who has the slightest insight into the rulings of Islam.
From the fatwas of Shaykh Ibn Baaz, from Kitaab Fataawa Islaamiyyah, 1/46.

Comments are closed.